logo

Centre of Evidence of Dermatology Best practice guidelines

Guidelines hidradenitis suppurativa Updated on august 2019

Responsibility


The information provided by this website comes from sources deemed reliable. However, the French Dermatology Society recommends that the user ensure the validity of this information. Some may prove to be erroneous or be subject to typos or display errors.

The use of this data is under the sole responsibility of the user. The French Dermatology Society cannot be blamed for a misinterpretation of the data provided by the site, or in the event of erroneous information. This decision tree and all the contents of this site have been developed in the context of updated data from science according to the HAS methodology, expert opinions and reviewers of the various documents and in the context of the French healthcare system.


Surgery

Back to decision-making tree Print last updated on 01/04/2020

Surgery is to be considered systematically within a medical and surgical concertation meeting.

Surgery can be chosen depending on clinical presentation, as an urgent measure for abscesses, or can be scheduled in other cases.

For a fluctuant abscessed nodule: urgent incision and drainage or deroofing with a biopsy punch are indicated for immediate pain relief. This is not a definitive treatment and relapses are frequent.

For a Hurley stage Ⅰ persistent cold nodule, or Hurley stage Ⅱ sinus tracts (tunnels, fistula), the following can be envisaged:

These types of excision are most often performed under local anaesthesia, tumescent if necessary, and can therefore be performed by dermatologist expert in dermatological surgery.

For a scar mass, Hurley stage Ⅱ bands or particular stage Ⅲ bands, a wide excision under general anaesthesia is suggested: a wide (1-3 cm) and deep safety margin of healthy skin is recommended. Loss of substance should not be reduced to facilitate reconstruction.

wide excision
wide excision

Surgical incision performing away from nodular lesions and sinuous tracts (Hurley stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ) with deep safety margin in healthy skin space for complete removal.

Direct suturing is generally impossible and the wound must be closed either by controlled healing or by thin or flap skin graft. Wide excision has better therapeutic results, with the lowest rate of relapse in the area treated (0-15 %). It involves prolonged local post-operative care. In the long term, there is a risk of retractile scars (in particular axillary contractures, vulva widening, stenosis or anal incontinence) which should be anticipated by posturing and physiotherapy.

Videos

Armpit fistulas deroofing

Source: Dr O. Cogrel

Click to launch video via Youtube

Vulvar fistulas deroofing

Source: Dr O. Cogrel

Click to launch video via Youtube

Laser CO₂ deroofing

Source: Dr O. Cogrel

Click to launch video via Youtube

Large excision thin skin graft

Source: Dr O. Cogrel

Click to launch video via Youtube
photo
Result
  • Was this article helpful to you?
  • Your opinion counts!

    This notice will not be published on this site, but only sent to the publication management. Your email will only be used to reply to you if we deem it necessary. No response will be sent to any request for medical advice via this form.


back to decision-making tree

Centre of Evidence of Dermatology Centre of Evidence of Dermatology logo
Work
10 cité Malesherbes
75009Paris
Île-de-France
FRANCE
Work +33.1 43 27 01 56
Fax +33.1 43 27 01 86
centredepreuvesdermato@sfdermato.org